Image: ISHR
ISHR welcomes the adoption by the Committee against Torture (CAT) of a procedure that enables the submission of third party interventions to individual communications. By doing so, the CAT aligns with the practice of fellow UN Treaty Bodies.
Third party interventions (TPIs) – or Amicus Curiae – can have a significant impact on process, resulting in just outcomes and the advancement of international human rights law. A number of Treaty Bodies have adopted dedicated procedures in recent years to enable and facilitate the submission of TPIs.
ISHR’s recent guide on Third Party Interventions to UN treaty bodies provides the first compilation of existing procedures, practical tips for petitioners on the submission of TPIs, and an overview of existing TPIs to UN Treaty Bodies made public by authors.
So far, the Committee against Torture (CAT), despite being one of the two Committees receiving most individual communications, together with the Human Rights Committee, had no dedicated procedure, and was lagging behind. The CAT procedure will enable the Committee to receive, or source, specialised or focused submissions on substantial issues that may arise from the consideration of individual communications. The procedure is all the more welcome as Treaty Bodies normally do not get to hear the victims, therefore TPIs can help the Committee to get to a better understanding of specific issues related to individual communications under review.
Philip Grant, the Executive Director of TRIAL International, an organisation which has brought a number of cases to the CAT, welcomes the new Guidelines.
Third party interventions can significantly enhance the contextualisation and understanding of a specific matter under consideration by the Committee as part of the review of individual communications. We look forward to consider making use of this opportunity.Philip Grant, TRIAL International
For more information, click on the links below:
At a side event co-organised by ISHR on the sidelines of the 81st Ordinary Session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, panellists reflected on developments and regress regarding the protection of defenders’ rights 25 years after the adoption of the UN Declaration on human rights defenders. They also commented on the role of the Declaration +25.
In a series of groundbreaking rulings in early 2024, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Colombia set new precedents that significantly enhance protections for human rights defenders across Latin America.
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights examines the Escazú Agreement's role in safeguarding environmental defenders, a landmark move for climate justice and human rights.
