Last week the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association presented his report to the Third Committee of the General Assembly urging states and private sector to respect the exercise of human rights of those mobilising peacefully to address the climate crisis.
By Deborah Brown, Senior Project Coordinator, and Jac Sm Kee, Women’s Rights Programme Manager, Association for Progressive Communications
In recent years, revelations of mass governmental surveillance have propelled the right to privacy into the public eye and discourse. However, equal attention needs to be given to surveillance practices by individuals against each other, as well as by the private sector and non-state actors. Mass surveillance is a grievous human rights violation, and public outrage is well deserved. But threats that at-risk users and marginalised groups experience are equally important. Human rights defenders and women human rights defenders (WHRDs), sexual rights activists, political opposition, religious and ethnic minorities, and independent journalists, in particular, are regularly subjected to surveillance and have their privacy rights persistently violated.
Importance of privacy online to women and women human rights defenders
Privacy helps to establish boundaries that limit who has access to our bodies, gives space to express ourselves, experiment without judgment, and think freely without discrimination. To put it simply, privacy allows us to imagine what we could be, and a world that is better than this one. It is also an important right in the exercise of autonomy and self-determination. This is particularly true for women and WHRDs, who rely on privacy online to assert their rights in the face of significant power imbalances, face online aggression, and to gain access to critical information, including those related to health and safety.
The Association for Progressive Communications’ (APC) work with WHRDs and survivors of harassment, in particular in the online environment, has demonstrated how important privacy online is to physical integrity offline. In particular, women are targeted because of the existing discrimination they face. Blackmail, extortion, persistent harassment and humiliation are all tactics used to silence women and WHRDs. Exposure of personal information such as name and geographical location (‘doxing’) poses an immediate offline risk to physical safety and employment to women in particular, and human rights defenders generally.
APC’s research conducted in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Mexico, Pakistan and the Philippines has found that online anonymity, for example, can be a powerful tool for combating online harassment and technology-related violence against women. In particular, our research substantiated that online anonymity enables the targets of hate speech and violence online to engage with their aggressors and encourages counter-speech from broader communities. Since legal remedies often fail to recognise tech-related VAW, or incidents are not taken seriously by police, courts and other administrative systems, survivors use technology to face and monitor their aggressors, and rely on online anonymity in order to do so securely. As a result, WHRDs are learning to privatise their online presence in order to campaign without fear for themselves and their loved ones.
To give just one example, Antonia and other employees of the Colombian feminist organisation Mujeres Insumisas have faced constant and increasing threats admonishing them to stop working for women’s rights – some identified as being authored by paramilitary groups. As a result, the organisation designed and implemented self-protection privacy measures, including recommendations for database handling, movement to and from the office, managing location information for the team, and maintaining confidentiality on social networks.
It is important to note that restrictions in legislation and regulation that are put in place for the expressed purpose of preventing online harassment often harm underprivileged groups while not effectively limiting their use by criminals who often have better access and training on using such tools. In states that crackdown on civil society, activists and minorities these regulations often take the form of disproportionate measures and are used as tools to punish or limit civil participation, circumvent due process, and frequently put the privacy of the majority at risk, through data retention for example.
Expectation of the new Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy
We welcome the Human Rights Council’s establishment of a new special procedure on the right to privacy as a necessary step to fill a significant gap in the conceptual and practical understanding of the right to privacy. We encourage the new special rapporteur to address the specific challenges that WHRDs and other at-risk communities face with respect to privacy, in particular the specific threats that individuals and communities face as a result of surveillance and the effective remedies to individuals whose rights to privacy have been violated. It is important for the new special rapporteur to integrate a gender perspective throughout the work of the mandate, and to reaffirm commitments to non-discrimination as a crosscutting principle in international human rights law. The new special rapporteur should look to UNGA resolution on Protecting Women Human Rights Defenders (resolution 68/181) for guidance in this respect.
 APC, (2015), Case studies on women’s experiences of technology-related VAW and their access to justice, see www.apc.org/en/pubs/cases-women%E2%80%99s-experiences-technology-related-vaw-a
Photo: flickr g4ll4is
Today, UN member States elected members to the UN's top human rights body, the Human Rights Council, for the 2022-2024 term. 18 candidates ran for 18 seats, and all were elected, leaving civil society disappointed in a process that can hardly be called an election.
ISHR joined Sudan Women Rights Action, Nora Center for Combating Sexual Violence and MENA WHRD Coalition in calling on the Human Rights Council to support Sudanese women human rights defenders in their struggle for democratic transition, gender equality, peace, and protection from violence.
Mozambique has accepted 236 of the 266 recommendations received. While this highlights a slight progress since their last Universal Periodic Review (UPR), the human rights situation in the country still needs large structural improvements.
During the adoption of the outcome of its Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the 48th session of the Human Rights Council, Niger manifested its willingness to cooperate with human rights mechanisms by accepting almost all the recommendations. However, more efforts for an efficient implementation remain necessary.
Despite Sierra Leone's acceptance of recommendations aiming to improve civil society’s space, cases of reprisals against human rights defenders are still reported.
To commemorate the International Safe Abortion Day, ISHR joined 372 organisations as well as women human rights defenders working to prevent maternal deaths, including through ensuring safe abortions, to demand free, safe and accessible abortion for everyone, NOW!
The DRC has noticeably improved the protection of human rights in the Kasaï region but progress remains slow and action is still needed towards transitional justice and the protection of defenders in this region.
Human rights organisations* urge the immediate and unconditional release of Egyptian human rights defender Mohamed El-Baqer, who completes today two years in arbitrary detention.
Human rights defenders in Saudi Arabia continue to face an increasing crackdown including arbitrary detention, ill-treatment, and medical and administrative neglect. The UN Human Rights Council must take action by establishing a monitoring and reporting mechanism on the human rights situation in Saudi Arabia.
Ten organisations renew their call for the immediate and unconditional release of Egyptian human rights defender Abdulrahman Tarek as he receives Index on Censorship’s Freedom of Expression Award
Despite the Burundian government’s efforts, the human rights situation in the country remains a matter of concern. During the presentation of its report, the Commission of Inquiry underscored the necessity to take more significative actions to pave the way towards sociopolitical stabilization and democracy.