Flickr/Eneas De Troya
With international accountability urgently needed, and amid intensifying post-election repression, the UN Human Rights Council should renew the mandate of its Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Venezuela, 29 national and international organisations defending human rights in Venezuela said today.
The Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) can play a key role in pushing for accountability and maintaining international scrutiny amid widespread repression following the 28 July election, the rights groups said (full list of signatories below).
The FFM’s team of three experts are scheduled to present their fifth report on 19 September during the 57th session of the Human Rights Council, which will take place between 9 September and 11 October. A resolution is needed to extend the mission’s mandate beyond October.
A group of Latin American governments, from across the political spectrum, as well as Canada, have in the past presented a text establishing the Mission’s mandate for adoption. If a vote is called by the Council’s Member States, a simple majority is needed to adopt the text.
‘In the aftermath of the presidential election, Venezuelans are facing a violent crackdown on voters and protesters, political leaders, journalists, human rights defenders and other actual or perceived alleged opponents of the Maduro administration, making the need to renew the expert’s mandate especially urgent’, the groups said.
The Human Rights Council established the Mission in 2019 to investigate ‘extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary detentions and torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment since 2014,’ including sexual and gender-based violence, with a view to ‘ensuring full accountability for perpetrators and justice for victims.’ Its mandate has been renewed twice, in October 2020 and 2022.
The FFM was one of the first international mechanisms to assert that Venezuelan authorities have committed serious human rights violations as part of a widespread or systematic attack against the civilian population, that could constitute crimes against humanity.
In its rigorous reports, it has identified mid- and high-ranking authorities, including the head of State, as possibly responsible for human rights violations such as extrajudicial executions, arbitrary detention and torture, sexual violence, as well as abuses against demonstrators.
The FFM has also referred to the Venezuelan judiciary’s role in these violations and the State’s repressive tactics, including a plan to repress opposition members or those perceived as such, and the lack of genuine reform of law enforcement institutions.
Millions of Venezuelans participated in the election, despite the government’s irregularities and human rights violations that made the playing field uneven. Government authorities arrested opposition members, delivered stigmatising speeches, attacked civic space, disqualified candidates, and imposed voting restrictions.
The National Electoral Council asserts that Nicolas Maduro won the election, but a UN Electoral Technical Team and the Carter Center – the only technical observation missions accredited by the Council to observe the elections – concluded that the process lacked transparency and integrity. The opposition published online ballot receipts indicating that opposition candidate Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia had won the election by a significant margin.
Since 29 July, Venezuelan public authorities have activated their repressive policy, violating human rights, including to life, judicial guarantees, and liberty. Venezuelan security forces, as well as pro-government armed groups, known as ‘colectivos’, repressed demonstrations against the announced electoral result, leading to, reportedly, over 20 deaths of protesters and bystanders. More than 2,400 people have been arrested, including 120 children, and many have been charged with ‘terrorism’ and other criminal charges. The Venezuelan justice system, including the Supreme Court of Justice and the Attorney General’s Office, lacks independence and impartiality, as the FFM has rigorously documented in its reports.
‘Other structural conditions that facilitated the commission of grave abuses and prompted the creation of the Fact-Finding Mission remain unaddressed, including impunity for rights violations, and the lack of judicial independence and redress for victims’, the groups said.
‘By renewing the Mission’s mandate, governments would send a clear message to perpetrators that the international community is committed to holding them accountable for their international crimes and ongoing human rights violations as well as to support the struggle of so many victims to achieve truth and justice’, the groups added.
‘Ongoing investigations and public reporting by the Mission are also essential to prevent further deterioration in a critical post-election period. Renewing the mandate would allow experts to continue gathering evidence of serious human rights violations, report on current dynamics in the country, analyse their root causes, and recommend international action. It would also allow the Mission to support and complement the roles of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, which is investigating crimes against humanity in Venezuela.’
‘Discontinuing the Mission’s work in such a pivotal moment would have negative implications for the protection of victims, survivors and the general population, and would provide an incentive for the Venezuelan government to continue its violent crackdown on dissent’, the groups concluded.
List of signatory organisations:
It's time for the Human Rights Council to show its support for the renewal of the mandates of the Fact-Finding Mission and OHCHR on Venezuela for another two years. We need as many HRC members to vote in favour of the resolution renewing these two mandates. Send an email to key Council members and call on them to vote YES! on the resolution on Venezuela.
Add your voice
In 2024, national, regional, and international courts took action to protect and recognise the rights of human rights defenders. In this article, we explore some of the key cases that have shaped the legal landscape for those advocating for human rights.
Stolen Presidential elections, the use of deeply repressive tactics by State agents against real and perceived opponents, and the recent return of OHCHR to Caracas informed today’s dialogue on Venezuela between the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Human Rights Council.
The Secretariat of the Declaration +25 marked the International Human Rights Defenders' Day on 9 December 2024 by launching a new video.
