During each ordinary session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘The African Commission’), Commissioners present their activity reports which provides an overview of the work done in between two sessions. On 23 November 2021, the Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders and Focal point on reprisals presented his report.
In Egypt, Case 173 of 2011, known as the NGO Foreign Funding Case, which initially targeted foreign organizations and then Egyptian activists and organizations, continues to be an impediment to women human rights defenders (WHRDs), feminists and the work of feminist organizations. The case, which dates back to 2011, led to the persecution and targeting of the independent and diligent voices of human rights organizations and human rights defenders, including WHRDs. During its second wave, which started in 2014 and continued through 2021, feminists and their organizations were especially targeted.
Several feminists and WHRDs have been targeted in the case, but only a few have made this targeting public. Others too fearful to speak up, have chosen to try to address their ordeal quietly. At present at least 5 WHRDs continue to be targeted by Case 173.
It is important to highlight that as the Egyptian government announced its national strategy for human rights and declared its commitment to close Case 173 to international allies, some organizations have had their cases dropped. However, other organizations continue to be targeted in this case and in some instances, where WHRDs have been exonerated or organizations have had their cases closed, their efforts to lift travel bans and asset freezes have been met with resistance. Other organizations have had Case 173 closed, while being referred to other courts for investigation on charges such as tax evasion, as a means to silence their important work and punish them in an alternative way.
Most recently, lawyer, feminist and WHRD, Azza Soliman, was exonerated from Case 173 on 30 August 2021. But that exoneration did not automatically lift the travel ban and asset freeze against her and her law firm, Lawyers for Justice and Peace. In order to lift the travel ban and asset freeze, she submitted an appeal so her request can be looked into by a Criminal Court. Instead, the Terrorism 4th Circuit Court at Tora Security Institute took up her case. This begs the question, why is a court charged with overseeing terrorist cases assigned to rule on the travel ban and asset freeze of a feminist civil society activist and her organization? Moreover, the case still includes 5 other WHRDs and feminists, including the cofounders of the prominent ElNadeem Center for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Torture, which has been leading work against torture in Egypt for more than 25 years. The founders, WHRDs and feminists, Dr. Magda Adly, Dr. Suzanne Fayyad and Dr. Aida Seif ElDawla, who is banned from travel, have all been interrogated and subjected to judicial harassment as a result of Case 173. This judicial harassment continues despite the fact that on January 21, 2021, the Administrative court overturned the 2016 decision by the Cairo governorate to close ElNadeem. The reluctance of the courts and security agencies to close the case against ElNadeem’s founders points to the important work of the center while Egyptian authorities are trying to stifle civil society through all means possible.
Ten years after its start, the NGO Foreign Funding case continues to silence voices that speak out against human rights violations. Alarmingly, Egypt’s refusal to fully close the case and end its targeting of rights defenders and organizations shows it has no intention to open the public sphere for independent civil society.
The undersigned, representing regional and international feminist, women’s rights and human rights, organizations, call on the Egyptian state to immediately drop the charges and lift any travel bans and asset freezes against all those still prosecuted in Case 173 including Magda Adly, Suzanne Fayyad, and Aida Seif ElDawla. We also call on the Egyptian judiciary to immediately lift the travel ban and asset freeze against Azza Soliman and her law firm.
We strongly urge the international community to be vigilant about the fate of individual activists and organizations targeted in Case 173, and to ensure that Egyptian authorities end their targeting of civil society and allow them to freely carry out their work. .
The Egyptian government needs to show a genuine interest in improving the condition of human rights in Egypt by dismissing cases against civil society activists and organizations peacefully exercising their right to speak out against rights violations by both state and non-state actors.
2. AGITATE! Unsettling knowledges
3. Andalus Institute for Tolerance and Anti-violence Studies
5. Democracy in the Arab World Now (DAWN)
6. EuroMed Rights
8. Feminist Studies Center
9. Frontline Defenders
10. Global Fund for Women
11. Gulf Center for Human Rights
12. International Service for Human Rights (ISHR)
13. International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific
14. Iraqi Women Network
16. Mediterranean Institute of Gender Studies-MIGS
17. Nobel Women’s Initiative
18. Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED)
19. Realizing Sexual and Reproductive Justice (RESURJ)
20. Syrian Journalists Network Organization – The Netherlands
22. To Be Organization for Rights and Freedoms
22. Virtual Activism
23. WHRD MENA Coalition
24. Women Living Under Muslim Laws (WLUML) Network
The passage of a human rights defender resolution by the Third Committee of the GA by consensus, with 85 co-sponsors, is another important step in ongoing work to strengthen the promotion and protection of those who defend rights.
During its 76th session and in a move welcomed by civil-society, the Third Committee of the GA adopted by consensus a resolution recognising the rights of all people to participate in elections and public affairs, without discrimination, including on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity.
Civil society calls for an end to attacks against Sudanese women protestors and WHRDs following the military coup.
ISHR joins 15 NGOs in calling on Egypt to immediately communicate to Salah Soltan’s relatives his whereabouts, and release him from detention.
Sudanese human rights defender Abdulaziz Adam addresses the HRC to draw attention to the human right situation in Sudan.
Following a rise in the use of platforms to dehumanise persons based on their sexual orientation or gender identity and foster intolerance, the UN Independent Expert presents two reports from complementary angles.
Following the designation of six Palestinian CSO as terrorist organisations, the international community must support and protect and ensure a safe and enabling environment for Palestinian civil society and HRDs.
The Covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated the risk of human rights violations online. Do technology companies have human rights obligations? What are they? Do these private actors have a duty to promote human dignity online?
The international community must take urgent action to protect the democratic transition and human rights in Sudan, especially those of women and women human rights defenders.
ISHR and TIMEP submitted to CEDAW recommendations intended to bring Egypt in line with its constitutional and international legal obligations, and to address the root factors of violations against women.
HRC48: Women defenders engaged in the defense of the right to land, territory and indigenous rights demand that the UN and the international community recognise their key role in protecting humanity and the environment.