National and international organisations sent a letter to the new Colombian government with three recommendations to prevent crimes and improve the security of human rights defenders.
Acts of reprisals against individuals, as well as their family members and legal representatives, ‘run contrary to the very principles of the UN, and violate human rights’ said the UN Secretary General in his report released earlier today. This May, ISHR made a submission to inform the report.
‘It is gravely concerning that, as in the past, this years’ report includes a increased number of reported cases of intimidation and reprisals for cooperation with the UN on human rights’, said ISHR’s Legal Counsel Tess McEvoy. The report raises 36 cases from 29 countries.
Not only are there more cases, but the range of reprisals and intimidations has become ‘broader’, and the ‘means used increasingly blunt’. Cases included travel bans in Egypt, India, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain; freezing of financial assets of various human rights organisations working for victims of torture; intimidation in Honduras, India, Myanmar, Rwanda, South Sudan, and Sri Lanka; ill treatment in Mexico; sexual assault in Bahrain; torture in Burundi, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco and Pakistan; arbitrary detention in Oman, The Sudan, The United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and China; and killing in Honduras.
These violations were associated with cooperation with various UN agencies, including:
- the Human Rights Council;
- Special Procedures;
- Treaty Bodies;
- the Universal Periodic Review;
- human rights components of peace missions;
- the International Labour Organization; and
- the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims.
Disturbingly, while these figures are themselves concerning, this report only captures cases submitted to the Secretary General, and of those submitted, only cases previously referred to in official UN documents. This means that they represent only a small portion of violations out there. For example, ISHR has previously reported on cases in Eritrea, Honduras and Venezuela that do not appear in this compilation.
‘As stated by the High Commissioner earlier this year, cases of intimidation and reprisals are an attack on a fundamental element of the work of the UN – systematically undermining UN action on human rights and shaking partners’ trust in the organisation,’ said ISHR Director Phil Lynch.
‘We condemn patterns emerging from cases in this and previous reports, indicating a strategy by some States to prevent individuals providing information or cooperating with the UN on human rights,’ Lynch added.
The responsibility of States and the need for further action
Disappointingly, the report notes that while non-state actors are also responsible for reprisals, in the majority of cases in the report acts were often perpetrated by, or at least condoned by, State officials. Further, many concerns expressed by UN officials on cases have not received a Government reply, or where replies were received, they did not address concerns raised.
The Secretary General calls on all States to follow-up and provide responses on cases included in this and previous reports: ‘I reiterate that States must end these acts, investigate all allegations, provide effective remedies and adopt and implement preventative measures to prevent reoccurrence’.
Designation of the mandate of the Assistant Secretary General
The report refers to the groundbreaking designation of the Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights (ASG), Andrew Gilmour, as senior official to lead efforts within the UN system to address intimidation and reprisals against those cooperating with the UN on human rights.
Citing the designation as ‘recognition by the organisation that these acts are unacceptable, and underscores the need to strengthen action across the system to prevent, respond to and address them’, the Secretary General urges all stakeholders to report allegations of intimidations and reprisals.
‘We agree with the Secretary General’s call on all States, UN entities, bodies and mechanisms, civil society representatives and human rights defenders to cooperate fully with the ASG in fulfilling his mandate. This is the only way to end reprisals,’ said Lynch.
Duty of the UN to address reprisals
The Secretary General articulates the UN’s priority and core responsibility to respond and prevent these acts; a responsibility stemming from the ‘UN’s Charter-based duty to promote and encourage respect for human rights – not only a normative duty, but an operational imperative for ensuring respect for human rights, sustainable development and building secure and peaceful societies’.
‘We stress that the UN Human Rights Council is legally obliged to take action if it possesses information about a credible risk or allegation of reprisals,’ said McEvoy. ‘It has a legal duty to protect individuals who communicate, cooperate or seek to engage with the Council and its mechanisms’, added McEvoy.
The UN must act
The Secretary General ended by calling on the Human Rights Council, its Presidency, special procedures, the human rights treaty bodies and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue addressing cases of intimidation and reprisals brought to their attention and to coordinate with the ASG. Further, he called on the Council President to provide oral updates at each session on cases brought to his or her attention.
‘We welcome the call made to the Council to devote sufficient time to discuss this report and interact with the ASG. Alongside the presentation of this report, all eyes are on the Council and the current negotiation of the resolution on this subject’ said Lynch.
A resolution on the issue of reprisals was tabled this week by the core group – comprising Ghana, Hungary, Ireland, Fiji and Uruguay. This resolution acknowledges the gravity of the current situation on reprisals, and responds to the need for more to be done by States and the UN to effectively and appropriately address this issue.
‘We urge all States to take a strong stance on reprisals by supporting this resolution. It is integral that it clearly sets out both States, and the Human Rights Council – and its president’s– responsibility to prevent and ensure accountability for reprisals’ said McEvoy.
Contact: ISHR Legal Counsel and Reprisals Focal Point, Tess McEvoy, [email protected].
Check out our updated world map on legislative protection, which collates developments in national legal instruments related to defenders and compares existing and draft instruments with the standards set by the Model Law.
ISHR, along with multiple other NGOs, released a joint statement condemning the criminalisation of women human rights defender Milena Quiroz and calling for her right to a fair trial and her right to defend human rights to be guaranteed.