A group of civil society organisations led by ISHR has submitted contributions to the discussions on improving the Human Rights Council’s efficiency.
The letter stresses that efficiency cannot be separated from the UN’s wider financial crisis. States must pay their dues and safeguard the human rights pillar from further cuts. Short-term ‘time-saving’ fixes have reached their limits, and a shift toward long-term, strategic reforms that enhance—not reduce—the Council’s ability to respond to crises is what is needed.
The organisations warned against equating efficiency with ‘doing less’, noting that fewer resolutions, merged mandates, or reduced reporting are not in themselves indicators of effectiveness, especially amid genocide, global unrest and human rights emergencies. They highlight that any mandate consolidation should be guided by clear, objective criteria and carried out only after consulting mandate holders, civil society, and affected communities. Impact should be measured through long-term outcomes in consultations with local communities, not just outputs.
The organisations also call for stronger coordination between Geneva and New York, improved hybrid participation, and better access to UN information systems—especially for human rights defenders. Finally, they urge that any adopted reform include impact assessments and remain grounded in core human rights principles.
Read the full letter here