ⒸFlickr / Terry Feuerborn

News

Zimbabwe: President Mnangagwa-led Government must stop targeting and stigmatising civil society organisations

Over 40 human rights NGOs urge the government of Zimbabwe to desist from targeting and negatively profiling civil society organisations, which provide invaluable services to the people of Zimbabwe and play a vital role in ensuring good governance in the country.

As leading human rights and legal aid organisations, we urge the government of Zimbabwe to desist from targeting and negatively profiling civil society organisations, which provide invaluable services to the people of Zimbabwe and play a vital role in ensuring good governance in the country. All persons have a right to freedom of association, and this right is often exercised through the operation of and participation in civil society organisations. Stigmatising civil society organisations for engaging in legitimate activities, including carrying out their watchdog role is a dangerous step towards closing civic space, which is of the utmost importance in exercising the right to public participation in a democratic State, especially ahead of next year’s elections.

During the just concluded 73rd Ordinary Session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, State representatives from Zimbabwe maligned civil society organisations and their work with a view to intimidate and silence them. In particular, they made disparaging comments in response to a statement by International Services for Human Rights, Defend Defenders as well as Zimbabwe Lawyers of Human Rights (ZLHR) highlighting the well-documented human rights situation in the country, including concerns on the deeply-flawed Private Voluntary Organizations (PVO) Amendment Bill. Such attacks against civil society actors violate the rights to freedom of conscience, expression, and association, which are protected by the Zimbabwean Constitution, as well as international law instruments binding on the country.

Under the administration of President Mnangagwa, the Zimbabwe government has increasingly restricted the capacity of civil society to operate and continued down a dangerous path towards the near total closure of civic space. State authorities have engaged in repressive attacks on activists, journalists, human rights defenders, opposition party leaders and critical voices from all sections of society. Civil society organisations have decried the worrying trend of arbitrary arrests and detention; judicial capture and intimidation, as well as other forms of repression aimed at stifling dissent and resulting in a chilling effect.

As part of the crackdown on civic space, the government introduced the PVO Amendment Bill which confers unfettered discretionary powers on the executive arm of government to overregulate and interfere in non-governmental organisations’ governance and operations. Civil society organisations have expressed their concerns over the PVO Amendment Bill’s contravention of national, regional, and international standards of freedom of association, expression and assembly. In December 2021, four United Nations Special Rapporteurs sent a joint communication to President Mnangagwa emphasising that the Bill granted unchecked discretion to the government to target, deregister, and ban organisations and not compliant with Zimbabwe’s treaty obligations as articulated in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. While the controversial bill continues to be considered, the government has sustained its attacks on civil society organisations. Staffers of Transparency International, National Association of Youth Organizations and the Institute for Women Development have been arrested at different times during their meetings. The government has also arrested officers of the Zimbabwe Elections Support Network during a voters’ education event in Mbare.

In addition to utilising legislation to restrict civil society, government officials have maintained a narrative that non-governmental and civil society organisations, especially those critical of government actions, should not exist in Zimbabwe. Midlands Provincial Affairs Minister Larry Mavima minimised the importance of NGOs, stating that they are no longer necessary in Zimbabwe and therefore should relocate to Ukraine – a war zone, if they are unhappy with the PVO Amendment Bill. Justice Ministry Secretary Virginia Mabhiza labeled organisations speaking out against the PVO Amendment Bill as “rogue” and Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front (ZANU PF) spokesperson, Christopher Mutsvangwa, accused organisations operating in Zimbabwe of being “puppets of the West with a goal to soil the country’s image in a bid to effect regime change.” The ZANU PF Spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa further stated that NGOs are “fighting for the post-colonial order of the West” and should not be listened to. Moreover, he referred to NGOs as “false prophets” and “witches of the night.”

These narratives are incendiary and prejudicial, especially in the lead-up to a contentious 2023 general election. Stigmatising statements against those defending human rights, particularly by high-ranking officials in a context of high intolerance for peaceful dissent, de-legitimises the work of human rights groups, closes the needed civic space for them to exercise their right to free expression and association, and could put their lives at risk. This labeling of civil society organisations is also tantamount to hate speech which has been described by the United Nations as “any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are.”

As undersigned organisations, we request that:

  1. The government of Zimbabwe stops disparaging civil society organisations and ensures that they can fully and independently operate throughout the country in accordance with the Constitution and international law.

  2. The judiciary in Zimbabwe guards its independence and fulfills its constitutional mandate and protects the fundamental rights and freedoms of civil society activists and human rights defenders in adjudicating cases before it.

  3. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and other intergovernmental bodies must take steps to guarantee greater respect and protection for civil society organisations including by condemning the use of inflammatory language by State parties during their sessions.

  4. Regional and international communities should continue to put pressure on President Mnangagwa and other State officials to jettison the worrying sections of the PVO Amendment Bill, reflect the recommendations presented by civil society, and promote a thriving civic space within the country.

Signatures:

  1. Advocates For the Promotion of Digital Rights and Civic Interactions Initiative (DigiCivic Initiative)

  2. African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies (ACDHRS)

  3. African Defenders (Pan African Human Rights Defenders Network)

  4. Associação Moçambicana dos Advogados Cristãos

  5. Bayero University Kano Law Clinic

  6. Center for Human Rights and Democracy in Africa

  7. Centre de Documentation et de Formation sur les Droits de l’Homme

  8. Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria

  9. Centre for Women Human Rights Defenders in Africa

  10. Chapter One Foundation

  11. Civic and Legal Aid Organization

  12. Coalition Ivoirienne des Défenseurs des Droits Humains (CIDDH)

  13. Connect Hub NG

  14. Consortium of Ethiopian Human Rights Organizations (CEHRO)

  15. Defend Defenders

  16. Dunia Mekonnen, Penn Kemble Forum Fellow 2021-2022

  17. Entrepreneurship Initiative for African Youth (EIFAY Africa)

  18. FIDA Cameroon

  19. Foundation For Environmental Rights, Advocacy & Development (FENRAD)

  20. Initiative For Women Empowerment & Development (IWED)

  21. International Commission of Jurists

  22. International Service for Human Rights

  23. Jibril Sa’ed Law Firm, Somalia

  24. Justice Access Point

  25. Mozambique Human Rights Defenders Network

  26. Namibia Diverse Women’s Association (NDWA)

  27. National Coalition of Human Rights Defenders Uganda

  28. Nde Oduko Foundation

  29. Network of the Independent Commission for Human rights in North Africa

  30. Network of University Legal Aid Institutions, Nigeria

  31. Observatoire Ivoirien des Droits de l’Homme (OIDH)

  32. Protection International Africa

  33. Réseau des Défenseurs des Droits Humains en Afrique Centrale

  34. Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights

  35. Society For Economic Rights & Social Justice (SERSJ)

  36. Southern Africa Human Rights Defenders Network

  37. Southern Africa Women Human Rights Defenders Network (SAWHRDN)

  38. Sterling Law Centre

  39. Tanzania Human Rights Defenders Coalition (THRDC)

  40. Vivre Sans Violence

  41. West African Human Rights Defenders Network / Réseau Ouest Africain des Défenseurs des Droits Humains (WAHRDN/ROADDH)

Related articles

UN expert condemns targeting of human rights lawyers in China

A newly-released confidential letter by a UN Special Rapporteur documents the disbarment of human rights lawyers in China and the tightening ideological control over lawyers and law firms. The UN expert denounces disappearances, closed-door trials, harassment of relatives, travel bans, and other abuses targeting human rights lawyers.

ISHR submits over 1,000 signatures for Cao Shunli memorial in Geneva

On Tuesday 16 April 2024, ISHR delivered to both Geneva’s Administrative Council and its legislative counterpart, the Municipal Council, physical copies of the more than 1000 signatures collected in support of a memorial honouring Chinese human rights defender Cao Shunli. 

China: immediately release lawyer Yu Wensheng and activist Xu Yan

13 April 2024 marked one year since the Chinese authorities arbitrarily detained prominent human rights lawyer Yu Wensheng and his wife, woman defender Xu Yan. As their health steadily deteriorates, 30 rights groups and the European Union have renewed their call for their prompt release.