In newly published report, ISHR and four partner organisations assess China's lack of implementation of human rights commitments from its 2018 Universal Periodic Review (UPR). The report details the government's diverse strategies to silence and repress human rights defenders, lawyers, and journalists.
(New York) – Democratic States that value and respect a vibrant civil society should do more to support non-governmental organisations to have their voices heard at the United Nations, the International Service for Human Rights said today.
The call comes after very few such States stood for election to an important UN committee that regulates civil society access to the UN, vacating the field for the election of a number of repressive States whose intolerance for civil society at home looks set to further restrict NGO access to the UN.
‘The membership of the Committee on NGOs, which already is dominated by member States that are not supportive of civil society, is set to get worse in 2015,’ said Michelle Evans of the International Service for Human Rights.
States newly elected to the 19-member Committee on Non-governmental Organizations include the repressive regimes of Iran, Mauritania, and Azerbaijan.
‘The election of repressive States to the Committee means that human rights NGOs will face further obstacles in seeking to access and effectively participate in the Human Rights Council and other UN processes,’ Ms Evans said.
The Committee on NGOs makes recommendations to the UN’s Economic and Social Council about the accreditation of NGOs, which is a requirement for their participation in many UN meetings. This year the majority of candidates for election to the Committee have very poor track records in respecting and supporting civil society, non-governmental organisations and human rights defenders. Many of them, including China, Russia and Sudan, have also shown a disturbing pattern of attacks, intimidation and violence against NGOs who seek to cooperate with the UN human rights mechanisms.
‘The UN depends heavily on the free and safe cooperation of human rights defenders for its effective functioning,’ said Ms Evans. ‘It is completely incoherent that the same States that seek to fracture this partnership should serve on a Committee that governs civil society access to and participation in the UN.’
‘Member States that sit on the NGO Committee should be committed to a robust partnership between civil society, the UN and Member States, not only because the legal framework set out in the UN Charter and ECOSOC Resolution 1996/31 requires it, but because civil society has a crucial role to play in advising and enhancing the accountability of the UN and its member States,’ Ms Evans said.
Disappointingly, only a few such member States – including Greece, Israel, South Africa, Uruguay and the US – stood for election or re-election to the Committee on NGOs.
The dismal showing of candidates occurred despite a campaign by the International Service for Human Rights and others to urge moderate, open and accountable democratic governments in all regions to run for a seat on the Committee.
‘It is deeply troubling that more member States which profess support for civil society were not prepared to translate this rhetoric into action by standing for election,’ said Ms Evans.
The membership composition also means that democratic new members – such as Greece, which is replacing Belgium – will need to be particularly active and vigilant on the Committee.
‘We welcome the strong support that Belgium has given to civil society during its term on the Committee and urge Greece to play a similar leadership role. It is imperative that Greece continues Belgium’s outstanding work in protecting the right to unhindered access for NGOs to the UN, and positively influencing the Committee to fulfil its mandate of giving a voice to civil society at the UN,’ said Ms Evans.
It is crucial for public confidence in the NGO Committee, the ECOSOC, and the UN itself that the NGO Committee deal with applications for accreditation in a fair, transparent and timely way.
‘It discredits the UN as a whole when the NGO Committee is seen to reject or unduly delay NGO applications for accreditation just because some States oppose their views or disagree with the content of their work,’ Ms Evans said.
‘Human rights defenders want to and have the right to participate in the policy debates on issues that affect them and the communities they represent. The more their human rights concerns are marginalised or ignored, the more vital it is that those NGO voices are heard.’
The States elected to the NGO Committee on 23 April are:
- Africa: Burundi (re-elected), Sudan (re-elected), Mauritania (replacing Morocco), South Africa (replacing Mozambique) and Guinea (replacing Senegal).
- Asia: China (re-elected), India (re-elected), Iran (replacing Kyrgyzstan), Pakistan (re-elected)
- Eastern Europe: Russia(re-elected), Azerbaijan (replacing Bulgaria)
- Latin America and Caribbean: Cuba (re-elected), Nicaragua(re-elected), Uruguay (replacing Peru), Venezuela (re-elected)
- Western Europe and Others: Greece (replacing Belgium), Israel (re-elected), Turkey (re-elected), United States (re-elected).
Contact: Michelle Evans, [email protected], Programme Manager and New York Advocacy Coordinator
During each ordinary session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘The African Commission’), Commissioners present their activity reports which provides an overview of the work done in between two sessions. On 23 November 2021, the Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders and Focal point on reprisals presented his report.
On the last day of the NGO Forum, a panel was organised to officially launch the newly established Lusophone Platform for Human Rights in Africa.
In compliance with Article 62 of the African Charter, States have the obligation to report every two years on the legislative, administrative and political measures taken with a view to give effect to human rights guaranteed by the Charter. Despite the challenges of conducting the sessions online, it doesn't prevent the African Commission from holding States accountable to their human rights obligations.
The passage of a human rights defender resolution by the Third Committee of the GA by consensus, with 85 co-sponsors, is another important step in ongoing work to strengthen the promotion and protection of those who defend rights.
During its 76th session and in a move welcomed by civil-society, the Third Committee of the GA adopted by consensus a resolution recognising the rights of all people to participate in elections and public affairs, without discrimination, including on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity.
Concerned about the increase in the number of human rights defenders in exile in Africa, during its 27th Extraordinary session, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘the African Commission’) adopted resolution 439 mandating the African Commission to publish a report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders in Exile in Africa.
Civil society calls for an end to attacks against Sudanese women protestors and WHRDs following the military coup.
On 16 November, ISHR delivered a statement on the situation of human rights in Africa, with a particular focus on the criminalisation and arrest of women defenders in Sudan, of LGBTI defenders in Namibia and the progress made on legislative protection of defenders in Benin and Mali.
As we celebrate 40 years since the adoption of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights which established the African Commission, the NGO Forum seized the opportunity to analyse the engagement of civil society with the Commission the past 40 years.
ISHR joins 15 NGOs in calling on Egypt to immediately communicate to Salah Soltan’s relatives his whereabouts, and release him from detention.
Sudanese human rights defender Abdulaziz Adam addresses the HRC to draw attention to the human right situation in Sudan.